July 23, 2025
Seoul – South Korea’s armed forces management – consisting of previous protection priest and elderly leader – has actually ended up being the facility’s emphasis in 2 of the 3 unique consultant studies presently underway.
The twin probes concentrate on supposed prohibited drone procedures in Pyongyang, declared efforts to develop authenticity in the statement of martial regulation and protection of the fatality of a young Marine Corps in 2023, in which Yoon was implicated of misuse of his power to obstruct the first examination.
A group of unique consultants led by Cho Eun-Suk is proceeding an examination right into Yoon’s supposed martial regulation strategy, concentrating on Major General Kim Yong-dae, head of the armed force’s unmanned driving procedures command.
The examination comes from inner armed forces statement, asserting that Yoon straight got Kim Jong-il to carry out a Pyongyang drone procedure, bypassing the main hierarchy, consisting of the joint head of the Ministry of Protection and the Principal of Personnel.
The drone leader was implicated of being regulated to develop an official paper to cover North Korea’s drone procedures versus North Korea and bought staffs to send out drones without the authorization of UN Command.
According to the Unique Advisory Team, the Armed force Records record claimed that on October 15, 2024, the procedure of 2 drones was performed. Nevertheless, detectives discovered that just one drone was really released, and the various other drone was noted as missing out on.
The group presumed that documents were controlled to permit 2 drones to fly that day – concealing the accident in Pyongyang 6 days earlier on October 9.
After an unique lawyer query on July 17, the drone leader discussed: “It is difficult to precisely tape whatever regarding private armed forces procedures.” Included that the issue comes from “management imperfections.”
Detectives are currently analyzing whether previous Protection Assistant Kim Yangyang has actually contributed in affecting activities in the drone market.
They likewise considered Kim Jong Il’s unapproved drone procedure towards Yoon in October 2024, intending to influence North Korea and validate the martial regulation statement.
One more group of unique professionals – led by Lee Myeong-Hyeon and in charge of reconsidering the fatality of CPL. Chae Su-Geun – The very first apprehension warrant has actually been submitted with Seoul Central Area Court.
The group is looking for to restrain previous Marine Leader Lieutenant General Kim Kye-Hwan to prompt destructive perjury and to indicate and analyze offenses of the expense prior to the National Setting up.
Kim was determined as the individual apparently informed Colonel Park Jeong-Hoon, the Marine Private investigator that initially accountable of the Chae situation, and Yoon was mad after seeing the very first examination record.
King has actually refuted sending out such a message considering that Park made the case openly in 2023. King preserved his setting in numerous statement prior to the National Setting Up and the Armed force Court, charging the Park of harming the Militaries’ heritage because of what he called “Hero Disorder.”
Although the unique consultatory group got statement from others that claimed Yoon revealed temper at a conference with armed forces authorities, Kim supposedly remained to refute the claims throughout his current query.
Then-Defense Priest Lee Jong-Sup likewise sent a created declaration to the unique consultant, as released on Monday, affirming that he got a phone call from Yoon on July 31, 2023.
Although Lee was planned to move Marine Corps examination documents to authorities, he supposedly got a phone call from the number “800-7070” and determined not just to put on hold journalism meeting however likewise to move the situation. It was disclosed that the contact number was utilized by the head of state’s workplace.
Lee confessed virtually 2 years later on that the various other celebration was Yoon, attempting to clear up that the after that head of state did not reveal his temper or effort to disrupt the examination, however just his worries.
Lee was determined as complaint of misuse of power and blockage of the workout of civil liberties, and imposed a right and seizure order versus him.
